Choose models by job shape
Creative synthesis, deterministic extraction, and long tool chains are not the same workload. This page should say that directly.
Treat model choice as an operating layer, not a brand fetish. This page should help readers understand which model family fits the workload before they commit to a default setup.
Page framing
Teams rarely need one model forever. They need a clear way to reason about the tradeoffs.
worth comparing
3 families
reasoning, speed, and tool behavior shift by workload
without reworking the story
Hot-swap
the decision can stay separate from the deploy surface
prompt discipline
Operator-first
good launch pages describe the job before the model
Tags
Each detail page exists to reduce one category of uncertainty. The copy should be specific enough that the next product question is obvious.
Creative synthesis, deterministic extraction, and long tool chains are not the same workload. This page should say that directly.
If the user changes their model preference, they should not feel like they are starting the whole product story over from zero.
Good messaging hints that model selection can evolve as the workflow matures inside AutoClaw.
The structure should move from explanation to decision to the next useful product question without unnecessary detours.
01
Explain which work benefits from stronger reasoning, lower latency, or more predictable tool usage.
02
Readers should understand what they want first, what they can switch to, and what should remain optional.
03
The end of the page should feel like a confident product decision, not a brand handoff.
Focus on decision quality, not jargon density.
The next move should feel like refinement, not a context switch.
Once the reasoning layer is clear, move on to skills and workflow packaging.